Promoting penicillin allergy de-labeling for children attending a hematology clinic.

BACKGROUND: Up to 10% of children are reported to be allergic to penicillin, but many allergy labels are unverified and may require formal testing. Inaccurate drug allergy labels are associated with a range of adverse clinical outcomes. Patients with hematological disorders may experience frequent and severe infections; those who have been incorrectly labeled penicillin allergic may benefit from allergy de-labeling (ADL) efforts to facilitate access to beta-lactam antibiotics. We developed a multidisciplinary, pharmacist-driven process that enabled non-allergist trained providers to assess and de-label penicillin allergies in a pediatric hematology center. METHODS: Volunteers, including physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, and pharmacists, were trained in skin testing and oral challenge procedures. Patients were identified by review of electronic medical records for penicillin or penicillin-derivative allergy. Patient and family interviews were conducted in cases where a true penicillin allergy was deemed uncertain based on chart review. If allergy could not be de-labeled by chart review or interview alone, patients were offered skin and/or oral challenge testing. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were initially labeled as penicillin allergic. Allergy labels of 11 (19%) were removed by chart review only, and 15 (25%) after conducting interviews. A total of two (3%) patients were ineligible due to contraindications, and five (9%) declined participation. Twenty-six patients (44%) underwent allergy testing (50% skin testing, 50% oral challenge) of which 23 (88%) were negative. CONCLUSIONS: ADL was possible in most patients previously identified as penicillin allergic. Testing was well tolerated with no serious adverse effects.

Lactobacillus bloodstream infections genetically related to probiotic use in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant patients.

We describe a cluster of 6 pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with Lactobacillus bacteremia attributed to probiotic use. Lactobacillus isolates cultured from probiotics and patients' blood were proven to be related using whole-genome sequencing. Clinical studies are needed to evaluate the safety of probiotic use in immunocompromised patients.

Improving Blood Product Transfusion Premedication Plan Documentation: A Single-institution Quality Improvement Effort.

Introduction: Premedication with acetaminophen and/or diphenhydramine to prevent febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions and minor allergic transfusion reactions is a common practice based on historical recommendations. However, recent small randomized-controlled trials showed no benefit of premedication. This inconsistency leads to practice variability, which results in the inefficiency of our institution's blood product ordering process. This project aimed to improve the number of transfusion encounters with premedication plan documentation from a baseline of 19% to 80% in 12 months. Methods: A multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) team used QI tools to design interventions to improve the efficiency of the ordering process for blood products. Measures were tracked monthly and analyzed using statistical process control. Results: From September 2018 to January 2021, 5,351 blood product transfusion visits were scheduled. At baseline, 34% of patients received premedication, and 19% had premedication plans documented. Interventions included a passive computerized provider order entry alert, clinical care pathway development, and clinician education. Postimplementation, the average number of encounters with a premedication plan increased from 19% to 87%, whereas encounters receiving premedication decreased from 34% to 25%. There was no change in the average number of transfusion reactions (1.8 per 100 transfusions). Conclusions: Using QI methods, our team successfully standardized the blood product premedication plan documentation despite unclear best practices regarding blood product transfusion premedication. The team added premedication plan documentation training to new employee orientation for sustainability.

Experience using intravenous posaconazole in paediatric and young adult oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole exhibits broad-spectrum antifungal activity. An IV formulation became available in 2014. Few studies describing the use of this formulation exist in patients under the age of 18 years. This study describes our experience using IV posaconazole in paediatric and young adult cancer patients. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective chart review evaluated patients who received IV posaconazole and had at least one posaconazole plasma concentration obtained after five or more days with a consistent dosage. Relationships between doses required to achieve a plasma concentration of ≥1 µg/mL and patient age, weight and body surface area (BSA) were evaluated. The clinical record was reviewed to identify descriptions of any adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were analysed, with a median age of 10.5 years (range 1.9-22.9 years; 92% were <18 years). All patients were able to achieve a posaconazole plasma concentration ≥1 µg/mL during their treatment course. The daily mg/kg/day dose required to achieve the target concentration decreased significantly with increasing age of the patient (P = 0.018). Assessment of dosage based on BSA suggested a requirement of 225 mg/m2/day across all age groups <18 years. Adverse events documented in the clinical record were consistent with those described with the oral formulations. No CNS toxicities were observed with use of IV posaconazole. CONCLUSIONS: Concentrations ≥1 µg/mL are achievable and a BSA-based dosing approach may allow a consistent empirical dose for patients <18 years of age. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to ensure patients achieve therapeutic concentrations.

Pentamidine for Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Pediatric Oncology Patients Receiving Immunosuppressive Chemotherapy.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia is a life-threatening opportunistic infection in children receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapy. Without prophylaxis, up to 25% of pediatric oncology patients receiving chemotherapy will develop Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is the preferred agent for prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Pentamidine may be an acceptable alternative for pediatric patients unable to tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. A retrospective review was conducted of pediatric oncology patients who received ≥1 dose of pentamidine for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis between January 2007 and August 2014. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine the incidence of breakthrough Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia or discontinuation of pentamidine associated with adverse events. A total of 754 patients received pentamidine prophylaxis during the period. There were no cases of probable or proven Pneumocystis pneumonia, and 4 cases (0.5%) of possible Pneumocystis pneumonia. The incidence of possible breakthrough Pneumocystis pneumonia was not significantly different between subgroups based on age (<12 months [1.7%] versus ≥12 months [0.4%], P = 0.3), route of administration (aerosolized [0%] versus intravenous [1.0%], P = 0.2), or hematopoietic stem cell transplant status (transplant [0.4%] versus no transplant [0.8%], P = 0.6). Pentamidine was discontinued due to an adverse drug event in 23 children (3.1%), more frequently for aerosolized than for intravenous administration (7.6% versus 2.2%, respectively, P = 0.004). Intravenous or inhaled pentamidine may be a safe and effective second-line alternative for prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in children with cancer receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Barriers and Goals in Pediatric Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation: A Survey of Antimicrobial Stewardship Practitioners.

We undertook a cross-sectional survey of antimicrobial stewardship clinicians in North America and Australasia regarding practices, goals, and barriers to implementation of stewardship for pediatric oncology patients. Goals and barriers were similar regardless of clinician or institutional characteristics and geographic location. Strategies addressing these factors could help optimize antimicrobial use.